Coaching for safety

My IOSH Coaching for safety certificate arrived this morning. I would totally recommend the course delivered by Michael Emery, visit: www.securushealthandsafety.co.uk for more information. 

Email me or give me a call to discuss culture shift within your organisation. Safety has historically been about statutory compliance, as opposed to why people behave in the way they do. Understand the people within your organisation and more often than not they will engage with your vision, embrace the challenge and respect their safety and the safety of others around them. 

Cheshire firm in court after workers potentially exposed to asbestos

12 May 2015

A laboratory design and installation specialist has been fined after exposing workers, pupils and teachers to asbestos material at a school in Suffolk.

The incident in July 2012 occurred during refurbishment work to modernise parts of Newmarket College School’s Science block. During the work, managed by Labform Ltd, sub-contractors disturbed asbestos as they were removing a wall and channelling the floor.

The Cheshire firm was prosecuted at Ipswich Magistrates Court on Tuesday 12 May after an investigation found that the company had not arranged for a detailed Refurbishment and Demolition Asbestos Survey to be undertaken, as was required.

Labform Ltd, of Lymm, Cheshire, was fined £22,400 and ordered to pay £11,741 in costs after pleading guilty to four breaches of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.

Speaking after the hearing, HSE Inspector David King said: “Exposure to asbestos fibres is a serious and well known health risk, so it is essential that duty-holders take suitable and sufficient measures to prevent the disturbance, spread and exposure to asbestos.

“Failing to take action to identify asbestos while planning work, and to ensure that any contractors who may disturb asbestos are aware of the location and type of asbestos present, and not taking appropriate measures to protect the health of others, is totally inexcusable.”

 

Development company guilty of repeated safety breaches

21 May 2015
A development company has been sentenced for breaches of the Work at Height Regulations.

Landrose Developments Limited of North Circular Road, London, pleaded guilty to safety failings after a routine site inspection on 6 February 2013, which resulted in enforcement action being taken.

Landrose were carrying out construction of 20 domestic properties, including 10 houses and 10 flats at a site in Willesden when HSE inspectors arrived.

Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard that despite this action, the breaches were repeated at the construction site and resulted in further enforcement action.

However, despite the previous action, the breaches were repeated on the 30th August 2013 at the construction site, without any adequate means to prevent persons, materials or objects falling a distance liable to cause personal injury. This resulted in further enforcement action.

Landrose Developments Limited was fined £16,000 with costs of £2,221 after pleading guilty to breaching Regulations 6(3) and 10(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.There was also a victim surcharge applied.

This was a proactive prosecution for repeated work at height breaches on more than one site, without any adequate means to prevent persons, materials or objects falling and causing injury.

Kent boys’ school fined over pupil’s head injuries

The Governing Body of The Judd School, Tonbridge, Kent, was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £1,375 in costs after admitting a breach of Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. Magistrates agreed with HSE that the safety breach had been ‘substantial’ after a 14-year-old pupil was severely injured when he was hit by a shot put thrown by another boy.

The incident happened during a routine multi-sport PE lesson on 20 June 2014. The pupil had left a triple jump area and was standing on the edge of the shot put landing zone to check a friend’s throw when he was struck on the back of his head by a shot.

The pupil suffered life-threatening injuries and needed emergency brain surgery on a fractured skull. He has now returned to school but his injury has resulted in a permanent indentation at the base of his skull.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigated and identified the school had not adopted measures in its own risk assessment and PE guidance on multi-event lessons had not been followed.

HSE found the school had carried out a risk assessment for PE lessons. However, although it had referenced the guidance by the Association for Physical Education, it did not follow their recommendation that such lessons be restricted to a maximum of four sports with only one to be a throwing event.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Kevin Golding said:

“By not adopting the measures identified in their own risk assessment, The school put pupils at serious risk leading to a 14-year-old boy being struck by a shot put and suffering life-threatening injuries. It was a horrifying incident for him and his family and, of course, the rest of the pupils and the school itself. “While he is thankfully back at school, he will have to live with the consequences of the incident for the rest of his life. “It is vitally important that schools review their risk assessments for all PE lessons, but in particular for multi-sports lessons, to check that they are safe.”

HSE useful links

Sources of information and external advisory services

  • Legislation.gov.uk
    Legislation.gov.uk provides access to UK legislation online. Acts of Parliament from 1988 and Statutory Instruments (SIs) from 1987- are available on the site as well as draft SIs and legislation for Northern Ireland. The website is now in the process of uploading a large number of SIs from 1948 onwards where this legislation is still in force.
  • Employment rights
    Information about the legal rights and responsibilities of workers and safety representatives, from HSE.
  • Westlaw
    A comprehensive online legal information service supplemented with case law back to 1865, legal information back to 1267 and journal archives.
  • GOV.UK
    Information about starting up and running a business in the UK, including help if you're self employed or a sole trader.

Children not allowed to have balloons

How crazy, at least it was proven that there was no substance!!

Issue

Enquirer was told that they could not give out air-filled balloons to children after a library book event due to unspecified health and safety reasons. Instead they had to burst them and throw them away.

Panel opinion

What a lot of hot air! There are no health and safety regulations which stand in the way of children having fun with balloons.

Source: hse.gov.uk